Copyright © Richard Perry 2018. Copyright commencement date is 14th February 2018.
Richard Perry Versus.

Crime carried out by corrupt Defendant Judges supporting the other

Defendants.

Richard: Also add in all the judicial related correspondences such as that from the Ministry of Justice, the Office of the Attorney General, the Solicitor’s Regulation Authority and any other ‘law’ related correspondence.

Besides

the

apalling

attitude

of

the

UK

towards

IP

rights,

and

besides

the

recklessness

of

the

Defendants,

the

mortifying

amount of Judicial corruption that I have faced is the biggest disappointment and let down for me and for the entire nation.

In

2012/13

I

was

taken

to

Court

by

some

of

the

Defendants

for

their

claim

of

unjustified

threats

because

I

demanded

that

they

pay

me

for

the

use

of

my

work

and

patents

that

they

had

stolen.

They

immediately

employed

a

large

London

law

firm

(who

are

also

now

Defandants)

to

file

and

proceed

with

a

claim

in

a

United

Kingdom

Court

of

Law

that

was

based

on

perjury,

false

witness

testimony

and

unlawful

legal

tactics.

This

is

because

they

were

bringing

a

civil

claim

to

conceal,

what

is

now

proven

in

evidence

to

be,

a

substantial

criminal

conspiracy

to

steal

and

defraud

my

IP

rights,

which

makes

a

mockery

of

the

enitre

justice

system.

The

firms

and

law

firms

involved

in

this

dreadful

abuse

of

the

legal

process,

breached

their

oaths

and

legal

practice

licences,

and

were

aided

and

abetted

by

several

Judges

who

made

corrupt

and

fraudulent

judgements

against

me.

The

Judges

knew

all

along

and

were

extremely

well

aware

that

I

have

been

a

victim

of

my

opponents’

serious

crime

and

I

had

a

mountain

of

evidence

to

prove

it.

The

judges

aided

the

Defendants

for

the

hidden

agenda

of

rubbishing

intellectual

property

rights;

to

prevent

individuals

enforcing

their

rights

against

large

corporations

and

when

it

would

be

obvious

to

a

child

that

my

patents

have been stolen.

Early

on

in

proceedings

I

was

discussing

with

a

Judge

a

level

of

damages

of

around

400,000

for

the

loss

of

only

one

patent

and

where

the

defendants

themselves

had

submitted

figures

stating

they

had

made

more

half

a

million

pounds.

The

law

says

(Apple

vs.

Samsung)

that

I

would

be

entitled

to

the

turnover

made

from

the

patent

fraud/theft.

At

the

time

400k

would

have

just

about

been

enough

to

rescue

my

loss.

The

judge

told

me

that

I

would

have

to

be

a

large

manufacturer

to

get

almost

anything

at

all

or

anywhere

near

that

amount

of

money.

The

hearing

went

more

or

less

like

this:

Scoff,

Scoff,

Intellectual

Property?

We

don’t

want

anything

like

that

in

this

Country

ugh

.

You

definitely

won’t

get

anywhere

near

1.50

in

damages

in

this

court.

This

is

my

version

of

it

but

the

copy

of

the

order

is

found

under

the

Evidence

page

under

Published

Civil

Judgements

where

the

actual

order

makes

a

statement

to

this

effect.

Years

later

I

subsequently

asked

this

judge

to

explain

his

appalling

attitude

to

the

value

of

IP

rights

and

demanded

an

explanation

as

to

why

I

‘would

have

to

be

a

large

manufacturer’

to

be

entitled

to

the

money

and

protection

of

rights

that

I

paid

the

UK

Government

for.

He

replied

with

the

answer

“it’s

not

my

job

to

answer

questions

like

that”.

That

judge

even

put

his

statement

in

his

own

judgement,

therefore

proving

the

United

Kingdom’s

sinister

attitude

towards

people’s

intellectual

property

rights

and

vast

investments.

There

is

not

a

single

case

in

the

history

of

the

United

Kingdom

where

an

individual

has

successfully

sued

a

group

of

worldwide

corporations

for

millions

of

pounds

in

damages

for

intellectual

property

crime,

because

in

the

UK

intellectual

property

is

seen

as

completely

worthless.

My

allegations

and

statements

are

proven

in

undeniable and indisputable evidence, hence the criminal charges I am now going to bring.

During

the

hearings

and

trials

in

Courts

between

2013

-

2017

and

all

over

the

UK

from

one

side

of

the

Country

to

the

other

and

spanning

a

period

of

five

years,

all

I

experienced

was

ridicule

and

corruption

for

trying

to

stand

up

for

my

rights

and

for

everyone

else’s

rights.

On

some

occasions

some

Judges

refused

to

even

allow

me

to

speak

or

simply

cut

me

short

mid

sentence

or

twisted

everything

I

said

back

upon

me,

whilst

the

Defendants

and

their

law

firms

stood

there

in

Court

lying

through

their

teeth

and

submitting

massive

files

hundreds

of

pages

thick

of

false

and

misleading

documents

to

support

their

case.

Hundreds

of

pages

of

documents

that

they

knew

to

be

untrue

and/or

misleading

for

the

purpose

of

concealing

serious

and

organised

crime.

One

Judge

who

made

several

fraudulent

judgements

against

me

claimed

that

‘he

couldn’t

see

how

they

have

done

anything

wrong’

whilst

he

knew

that

the

Defendants

couldn’t

produce

the

evidence

that

they

would

have

to

produce

to

give

themselves

an

alibi

therefore

proving

my

allegations.

The

evidence

was

confirmed

and

proven

by

the

content

of

the

documents

that  

they  

themselves  

had  

submitted  

to  

the  

court  

to

try

to

conceal

their

crime.

The

judge

also

refused

me

access

to

any

and

all

evidence that would even further prove my allegations.

Link to published civil judgements Link to judicial related correspondence

Fraudulent  

abuse  

of  

the  

‘slip  

rule’:  

The

same

judge

involved

making

all

the

fraudulent

decisions

Richard

Hacon

even

deliberately

falsified

the

date

on

his

April

2017

judgement

to

date

it

as

being

made

in

June.

He

was

awaiting

my

reply

to

the

hearing

and

after

he

had

recieved

it

he

then

deliberately

amended

his

fraudulent

restraining

order

against

me

to

make

the

consequences

of

it

even

worse,

and

then

claimed

the

reason

for

using

the

slip

rule

for

the

amendment

was

that

he

put

the

wrong

date

on

the

judgement.

The

proof

that

the

amendement

was

further

damaging

is

that

he

didn’t

just

amend

the

date

from

April

to

June

-

he

amended

the

judgement

to

make

the

order

more

damaging.

This

will

also

be

put

to

the

Jury

because

it

is

now

an

undeniable

and

inexcusable

pattern

of

participation

in

serious

crime.

This

person

has

made

abusive

and

fraudulent

order,

after

abusive

and

fraudulent

order.

He

has

made

fraudulent

judgements,

ordered

contempt

of

court

costs

against

me

when

I

lectured

him

of

aiding

and

abetting

(in

my

own

words

because

at

the

time

I

didn’t

know

what

aiding

and

abetting

was),

then

made

injunctions,

restraining

orders,

more

restraining

orders

and

costs

orders

whilst

denying

me

all

access

to

the

evidence

that

he

knew

proved

serious

and

organised

crime

committed

against

me

by

the

other

Defendants.

In

the

April

2017

hearing,

when

the

Defendants

were

fraudulently

applying

for

another

restraining

order

against

me,

he

asked

the

defending

barrister:

‘what

if

the

bankruptcy

order

was

obtained

through

fraud’

and

the

barrister

said:

‘but

you

said

there

wasn’t

any’.

The

Judge

then

says:

“oh,

yeah.

Well

I

am

satisfied

that

Mr.

Perry

has

continued

making

threats….’

(because

I

had

applied

to

rescind

the

bankruptcy

order)

and

then

made

another

fraudulent

Judgement

against

me

and

yet

didn’t

order

any

costs

at

all

to

the

Defendants

when

in

every

other

hearing

he

had

awarded

costs

after

costs.

he

didn’t

award

the

twenty

thousand

pounds

in

costs

they

were

aksing

for

because

he

knew

that

what

they

were

doing

was

breaking

the

law.

I

will

be

demanding

that

this

person is removed from judicial office immediately and jailed for his involvement.

At

another

hearing

in

Sept

2015

before

the

same

judge

where

I

was

making

my

first

claim

against

some

of

the

Defendants

in

the

civil

courts,

the

same

judge

more

or

less

refused

to

allow

me

to

speak,

would

not

listen

at

all

to

the

long

list

of

offences

that

I

alleged

had

been

committed,

and

instead

ordered

a

restraining

order

because

I

didn’t

have

a

‘right

of

action’

because

I

had

been

made

bankrupt

-

which,

within

the

law

was

a

judgement

that

he

could

make,

However.

However.

Being

in

a

position

of

Judicial

Authority

and

when

you

are

presented

with

undeniable

and

indisputable

evidence

of

serious

and

organised

crime,

surely

you

use

your

Authority

to

further

investigate,

adjourn

pending

a

formal

investigation,

make

some

sort

of

order

to

protect

the

victim

‘deliver

thee

from

the

hands

of

thy

oppressors’

(bible

verses)

or

at

least

allow

a

case

to

proceed

knowing

that

the

bankruptcy

order

has

been

obtained

through

crime.

But

no

-

not

this

judge

and

not

in

the

United

Shit

Hole

Kingdom

-

the

land

of

cheats

and

liars.

He

further

exercised

his

judical

authority

to

try

to

make

what

is

basically

a

gagging

order

to

try

to

prevent

me

from

pursuing

my

claims

to

enforce

my

intellectual

property

rights,

regardless

of

his

undeniable

awareness

that

the

barristers

standing

before

him

had

brought

a

case

based

on

false

witness

testimony

and

perjury.

During

the

hearing

when

I

realised

I

wasn’t

going

to

get

any

fairness

at

all

I

put

a

simple

question

to

the

Judge

which

was:

‘what

if

i’m

right

in

all

of

this?’

and

at

first

he

ignored

me.

I

then

asked

the

question

again:

‘what

if

i’m

right

in

all

of

this

-

what

are

you

going

to

do

about

it?’

he

then

replied:

‘if

there

is

anything

that

vindicates

what

you

say,

then

there

will

be

criminal

sanctions’.

He

then

continued

to

deny

me

access

to

any

evidence

and

continued

to

make

a

highly

defamatory

and

corrupted

restraining

order

against

me,

despite

me

pointing

out

that

the

defending

law

firm

had

breached

their

practice

licences

and

were

knowingly

participating

in

serious crime that undermines the entire economy.

Recently

in

2017

and

after

more

judgements

had

been

made

and

now

being

at

the

cusp

of

the

biggest

criminal

case

in

the

history

of

the

United

Kingdom

in

relation

to

intellectual

property

crime,

I

emailed

the

Judge

and

asked

him

another

question

which

was

along

the

lines

of:

‘now

that

it

is

obvious

that

the

Defendants

have

brought

cases

based

on

false

witness

testimony

and

perjury

and

have

perpetrated

serious

crime

against

me,

do

you

now

accept

that

you

may

have

been

duped

or

deliberately

mislead

by

the

Defendants?’.

He

replied

stating

that

he

didn’t

answer

questions,

(so

basically

an

omission

of

guilty

mind;

mens

rea)

although

I

had

pointed

out

that

there

is

an

active

criminal

investigation

and

that

he

would

be

a

named

Defendant.

I

tried

extending

the

olive

branch

once

again

so

that

he

could

get

his

act

together

and

do

something,

anything,

to

try

to

unwind

this

situation

that

he

played

a

big

part

in

creating

and

put

it

right.

He

refused.

I

had

also

asking

him

how

would

he

feel

if

this

was

being

done

to

him

or

his

children?

He

ignored

the

question

and

continued

being

complicit

in

crime.

That

really

shows

the

simpleness

and

ugliness

of

this

crime

-

if

this

was

being

done

to

them

and

their

children

they

would

be

outraged

and

they

would be using all of the their judicial powers to put the criminals in jail.

During

another

hearing

before

his

colleague

in

February

2017

and

in

yet

another

application

to

subpoena

evidence,

his

colleague

must

have

realised

the

seriousness

of

the

situation

and

ordered

that

a

barrister

from

‘clips’

(which

is

a

pro

bono

unit)

act

for

me

at

my

hearing.

I

initially

said

‘no’

because

I

just

dont

trust

any

of

these

wretched

people

any

more

and

have

lost

all

faith

in

UK

Justice.

However

the

judge

insisted,

and

so

I

had

to

let

the

barrister

act

for

me.

Initially

the

barrister

just

didn’t

believe

me

because

my

allegations

highlight

such

dark

and

seedy

law

practices

and

he

just

didn’t

believe

that

a

large

law

firm

would

commit

such

serious

offences

to

conceal

crime

to

try

to

get

a

‘win’

at

any

expense.

So

we

agreed

that

I

would

do

the

talking

to

the

Judge

and

that

he

would

just

say

the

legal

bit

at

the

end.

During

the

hearing

I

pointed

out

why

I

wanted

the

evidence

which

was

to

overcome

the

restrictions

of

the

bankrupty

order

and

restraining

order

so

that

my

claim

could

proceed

due

to

their

being

obvious

crime.

The

judge

asked

me

what

evidence

I

wanted

and

I

gave

him

a

big

list.

Whilst

I

was

speaking

to

the

Judge

the

barrister

was

sitting

with

his

hand

over

his

face

to

try

to

get

away

from

the

whole

thing

and

make

it

look

like

he

wasn’t

supporting

anything

I

was

saying,

because

initially

he

still

didn’t

believe

me.

I

then

presented

more

and

more

undeniable

and

indisputable

evidence

to

the

Judge

and

to

some

degree

the

judge

clearly

understood

crime

had

been

committed

and

asked

me

a

question

along

the

lines

of:

“so

take

it

that

you’re

under

oath

now,

you’re

saying

to

me

that

there

has

been

a

criminal

conspiracy

against

you

and

that

others

have

become

involved

further

down

the

line

and

CBlaw

firm

have

been

complicit

in

this?”

I

replied:

“that

is

exactly

what

i’m

saying

and

here

is

the

evidence

in

this

file

that

proves

it”.

The

barrister

who

had

been

listening

to

this

conversation

had

now

taken

his

hand

away

from

his

face

and

was

sitting

upright

and

now

paying

proper

attention.

He

saw

that

I

wasn’t

going

to

waiver

under

pressure

and

that

I

was

sticking

to

my

allegations.

After

I

had

finished

speaking,

he

then

stood

up

and

said

to

the

Judge:

“well

if

that

is

true

what

Mr.

Perry

is

saying,

then

that

is

what

the

whole

thing

is

all

about”

(meaning

the

purpose

of

the

entire

justice

system).

He

then

continued

speaking

for

me

and

said

to

the

judge

‘well

in

this

case,

if

there

is

any

bar

to

be

set

to

allow

evidence

to

be

adduced

then

that

bar

should

be

fairly

low,

if

there

should

be

any

bar

at

all’.

The

judge

quickly

dismissed

what

both

of

us

were

saying

and

then

went

on

to

make

another

corrupt

and

fraudulent

judgement

against

me

and

denied

access

to

the

evidence

once

again

giving

the

reason

that

because

the

main

hearing

was

only

a

week

away

the

other

side

wouldn’t

have

chance

to

respond.

That

is

abuse

of

the

administration

of

justice

and

perverting

the

course

of

justice.

To

highlight

what

is

going

on

in

that

Rolls

Building,

when

the

Defendants

lodged

their

application

for

yet

another

restraining

order,

I

was

only

given

three

working

days

to

read,

respond

and

put

a

full

defence

to

hundreds

of

pages

of

false

evidence

and

case

law

that

for

an

individual

untrained

in

the

legal

profession

is

terrifying

and

yet

I

was

blocked

from

all

evidence

because

the

Defendants

‘have

to

have

a

full

seven

days

to

respond’.

These

are unfair and corrupted proceedings. It is abuse of the adminstration of justice.

I

t

was

ordered

before

the

first

trial

in

the

civil

case

that

I

could

bring

components

of

the

offending

product

to

court

to

show

how

it

worked

in

relation

to

my

patent

claims.

The

Defending

law

firms

told

me

they

would

bring

the

parts

so

that

I

didn’t

have

to

and

then

deliberately

attended

the

trial

without

the

parts

so

that

I

couldn’t

demonstrate

how

the

product

infringed

my

patent.

I

informed

the

Judge

of

this

deception

and

abuse

of

process

and

he

refused

to

adjourn

despite

obvious

concealment

by

the

other

side.

To

add

further

mockery

to

this

entire

situation

this

same

Judge

later

denied

me

access

to

the

evidence

that

would

prove

an

entire

range

of

serious

offences

and

then

made

judgements

against

me

for

his

reason

that

I

didn’t

have

enough

or

any

evidence

-

because

he

denied

me

all

access

to

it!

This

is

Judicial

crime

and

I

now

have

a

pattern

of

this

Judge’s

lawbreaking

and

criminal

behaviour

in

evidence

and

in

his

own

words.

That

particular

Judge

is

also

a

Defendant

in

my

claim.

That

Judge

was

subsequently

over-ruled

or

contradicted

at

least

twice

by  

his  

own  

colleagues

who

also

made

another

Judgement

on

June

14th

the

summer

of

2017

that

stated

in

the

ruling:

the

true

purpose

for

requesting

the

evidence

is

to

support

Mr.Perry’s

claim

for

conspiracy

and

fraud

because

it

would

prove

those

documents

[

that

the

Defendants

would

have

to

produce

to

give

an

alibi

]

don’t

exist.

Therefore

again

an

admission

by

a

judge

that

can

clearly

see

from

the

evidence

that

the

Defendants

have

carried

out

serious

crime

against

me

and

yet

low

and

behold

I

was

once

again

denied

access

to

the

evidence

and

had

my

application

rubbished

and

ridiculed.

This

judge

who

is

also

a

named

Defendant

uses

all

of

his

efforts

to

dismiss

everything

I

said

in

my

Court

bundle

and

yet

he

clearly

identifies

some

of

the

suspects,

the

fact

that

the

Police

refuse

to

co-operate

and

tried

to

throw

off

the

case,

the

trustees

and

Official

Receiver

are

complicit

in

the

situation

and

that

there

are

more

parties

and

more

products

involved.

He

also

admits

and

supports

the

fact

that

I

have

asked

for

evidence

over

24

times

and

claims

that

i’m

abusing

the

process

when

he

knows

the

evidence

would

prove

my

allegations.

This

is

the

ugly

face

of

corruption,

it

is

abuse

of

the

administration

of

Justice

and

this

person

should

also

be

removed

from

Judicial

Office.

It

doesn’t

matter

how

long

he’s

been

there - these are low level ranking Judges conspiring amongst themselves to commit crime and refuse to enforce IP rights.

I

later

sent

a

letter

to

that

Judge

informing

him

that

I

would

be

bringing

criminal

charges

against

the

Defendants.

I

asked

him

if

he

thought

that

it

was

a

fair

and

just

decision

to

block

access

to

evidence

and

refuse

to

adjorn

because

he

claimed

that

court

time

was

more

important

than

delivering

fair

and

proper

justice.

I

also

asked

him

to

provide

a

legal

reason

why

he

denied

me

access

to

the

evidence

if

it

wasn’t

to

carry

out

the

United

Kingdom

agenda

of

refusing

to

recognise

or

enforce

intellectual

property

rights

under

any

circumstances

whatsosever.

He

replied

stating

that

his

reason

was

because

I

had

a

restraining

order

against

me!

The

whole

point

of

the

entire

hearing

was

to

subpoena

evidence

for

use

in

a

hearing

the

following

week

to

rescind

the

restraining

order!!!

This

whole

situation

is

seedy,

unethical,

immoral

and

criminal.

This

is

the

High

Court

of

the

United

Kingdom

being

fucked

over

and

ruined

by

gutless

timid

little

fuddy

duddy

men

who

don’t

have

any

strength

of

character

or

integrity

and

who

so

easily

bow

to

the

Government

agenda

of

rubbishing

intellectual

property

rights,

depsite

them

having

been

paid

for

those

rights.

These

pathetic

little

men

all

want

to

be

called

‘your

Honour’

and

‘My

Lord’

and

all

this

shit,

when

they

don’t

have any integrity or any conscience and don’t know the meaning of the word ‘honour’.

I

wish

I

had

power

to

remove

these

people

from

any

position

of

Authority

because

I

would

rip

out

corruption

from

our

system

and

install

incorruptible,

unwaivering

iron

fisted

men

who

aren’t

afraid

to

deliver

thundering

blows

upon

criminals

that

are

destroying

our

Country.

I

would

rain

down

Justice

on

these

people,

pound

of

the

gavel

after

pound

of

the

gavel,

beating

them

into

oblivion

to

send

the

message

out

that

this

is

the

fucking

United

Kingdom

and

we

are

rock

solid

and

incorruptible!!!

If

you

dare

to

think

about

committing

crimes

here

or

if

even

a

strain

of

doing

harm

to

others

weaves

its

way

into

your

tiny

little

mind,

you

will

face

a

punishment

so

twisted

and

ugly

that

you’ll

wish

you

had

never

set

foot

in

the

Country.

But

i’m

dreaming

-

you

don’t

get

that

standard

of

Rule

of

Law

in

that

little

cesspool

of

corruption

on

that

shitty

little

island

in

the

middle

of

the

North

Atlantic.

All

they

want

to

do

is

fuck

one

another

over,

keep

the

foreigners

out

and

watch

their

nation

spiral

further

and

further

down

into

a

4th

world

state

of

affairs,

plagued

by

debt,

crime

and

a

lack

of

humanity

and

where

all

the

goodness

has

been

drained from the land.

The

judges

involved

in

this

situation

in

the

civil

courts

continued

to

deny

me

all

access

to

the

evidence

and

even

blocked

me

from

obtaining

transcripts

of

the

court

tapes

because

they

wanted

to

protect

themselves

and

cover

their

tracks

from

their

crimes

and

fraudulent

judgements

that

has

been

recorded

on

the

court

tapes.

I

still

have

two

appeals

left

in

those

cases

but

I’ve

lost

all

faith

in

the

United

Kingdom

corrupt

civil

courts.

Hundreds

of

years

of

legal

precedent

being

destroyed

by

fuddy

duddy useless old men who hate profit and despise success because they haven’t made it.

Basically

the

Judges

involved

(and

there

are

about

seven

of

them)

know

that

I

have

been

targeted

by

organised

crime

and

have

taken

action

to

support

it

and

allow

it

to

continue.

When

I

made

complaints

to

both

the

Lord

Chief

Justice

and

the

Judicial

Conduct

Office

I

was

shockingly

told

that

they

‘didn’t

know

what

misconduct

is’

and

that

my

complaints

were

‘vexatious’.

They

refused

to

take

any

action

whatsoever

and

authored

letters

to

me

in

a

fraudulent

manner

to

prevent

them

from

having

to

investigate.

This

is

called

perverting

the

course

of

justice,

abuse

of

the

administration

of

justice,

fraud

by

abuse

of

position

and

again,

-

simply

down

right

disgraceful

and

immoral.

Copies

of

these

letters

and

correspondences

can

be

found

in

the

evidence

page

or

through

the

buttons

below.

I

asked

different

Courts

to

subpoena

evidence

over

25

times

and

was

blocked

every

time

whilst

being

defenceless

and

suffering

immeasurable

loss.

These

events

are

crimes

against

humanity

and

it is the ugly face of corruption.

During proceedings at Bristol County Court I was again denied all access to any evidence in my appeal to rescind the bankruptcy order against me obtained through fraud and serious crime. The Bristol judge made an order against me denying all access to the evidence that I requested to be subpoenaed to use in my hearing. His order says : subpoena of evidence refused (july 2015). He then made a second and yet another corrupt and criminal judgement denying the recission of the banktupcy order for the reason stating that I didn’t have any, or a high enough level of, evidence - once again because he deliberately denied me access to it. To really top this off and highlight the extreme corruption going on in this, he then drafted an order and stated: “this new claim form alleges not only patent infringement but also conspiracy to cheat, steal and defraud” which is an outright lie. The claim form alleged patent infringement only because the Wiltshire Police deliberately misadvised me and misled me based on what the Defendants had told them. At the time I did not know that conspiracy was an actual offence. The word ‘conspiracy’ didn’t appear in a single document that I had written at any time prior to the judgement - over a thousand pages, and therefore I could not have claimed for this offence at that time. The reason that he made that statement was to try to stop later attempts of claiming conspiracy and fraud which hasn’t ever been litigated in any Court as of yet because the same case cannot be litigated twice. A copy of the claim form is found under the Evidence page along with the published judgement and my explanation of it. That judgement is crminal. He later refused to answer my questions put to him in a criminal investigation and he will be a named Defandant. His actions were deliberately protecting my opponents in the light of undeniable and indisputable evidence. That is crime. That is a breach of EU treaties, it is abuse of the constitution, it is abuse of the administration of justice, it is perverting the course of justice and it is United Kingdom Government corruption. That Judge has also been reported to the Police and to Action Fraud and I have received correspondence from them informing me that my complaint is open and active. These people do not deserve to hold judicial office. It is a public disgrace and belittles and ridicules the efforts of everyone in the Country making an honest contribution to it. The undeniable evidence that I do have such as the unlawful use of my name on the purchase orders of the Defendants used to order the offending products, the proof of a criminal conspiracy, proof of fraud and perjury was completely ignored by all of the Judges who heavily supported the national and worldwide firms who have bribed and influenced the United Kingdom Government into supporting their lawlessness. I have undeniable evidence of this found under the evidence tab. I have received correspondence from the President’s Office of the European Parliament that states that this type of lawlessness is a breach of EU Treaties and harmonious trading within the EU. The letter stated that the EEC expects sincere co-operation and not Authorities deliberately rubbishing intellectual property rights. Copy of the correspondence found under the evidence pages. The Judicial proceedings at the civil case hearings went more or less like this: Judge: Now Mr. Perry, this is the High Court. Today we’re going to play the corruption game. OK? What’s going to happen is: I’m not going to give you much of a chance to speak, but anything you do say i’m going to either dismiss or rubbish, or just simply twist it around against you. Anything that they say, i’m going to eagerly lap up and agree with regardless of us all being here because of their clear and obvious crime. I know that some of them are also barristers which makes their claim a public disgrace but the High Court refuses to recognize or enforce intellectual property rights under any circumstances, is that understood? Ok then, lets begin….. Defending Barrister: Oh and, Judge - he’s also not allowed to see any evidence that proves his allegations. Judge: Oh yeah that’s a good one - yeah, and you’re not allowed to see any evidence OK? Audience roaring with laughter: Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Ha Ha Haaaaaa, Haaaaa Ha Ha SO FUCK YOU entrepreneurs and business people of the United Kingdom - We FUCKED You! DO NOT INVEST YOUR MONEY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM IF IT HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS BECAUSE YOU WILL LOSE IT - ALONG WITH YOUR LIFE. THERE ISN’T ANY AMOUNT OF FINANCIAL COMPENSATION THAT CAN EVER REPAIR THE DAMAGE AND TRAUMA I HAVE SUFFERED, EVEN THOUGH IT MAY HELP REBUILD MY LIFE. HEED MY WARNING: DO NOT INVEST IN THE UNITED STINK-HOLE KINGDOM BECAUSE THESE CIRCUMSTANCES IS THE REWARD YOU GET.

That

is

called

perverting

the

course

of

justice,

aiding,

abetting

and

subornation

to

perjury

and

it

is

fraud

by

abuse

of

position.

It

is

also

simply

disgraceful

conduct

of

someone

in

a

positon

that

is

supposed

to

be

upholding

the

rights

and

freedoms

of

others.

This

judge

is

a

named

Defendant

and

there

is

an

active

City

of

London

Police

investigation

(Action

Fraud).

He

had

earlier

deliberately

rubbished

my

patent

by

adding

words

into

the

patent

that

didn’t

exist

in

order

to

support

his

twisted

judgement.

He

based

points

of

his

Judgement

upon

drawings

in

the

patent

that

he

knew

looked

different

to

the

product

unlawfully

manufactured

and

sold

by

the

Defendants,

again

to

substantiate

his

own

judgement.

he

stated

that

he

thought

the

fencebracket

in

question

‘had

to

be

horizontal

in

use’

to

infringe

my

patent

and

related

one

of

the

drawings

in

the

patent

to

support

his

statement.

The

Defendants

had

manufactured

a

product

where

the

top

was

positioned

at

a

decline

and

if

you

look

in

the

drawings

of

my

patent

and

on

the

very

next

page,

there

is

another

of

my

drawings

that

shows

a

product

almost

identical

to

the

offending

product

manufactured

and

distributed

by

the

Defendants

who

claim

‘we

didn’t

know

and

it

was

wasn’t

us’.

The

Judge’s

own

colleague

later

contradicted

him

and

agreed

with

me

that

particular

point

which

was

the

central

point

in

proving

patent

infringement

(conflicting

findings

of

fact).

Coupled

with

the

Defendants

using

my

name

to

order

the

goods

from

the

manufacturer,

it

proves

intent

and

proves

that

they

deliberately

set

out

to

defraud

me.

This

is

proven

in

evidence

in

the

very

patent

itself,

because

if

one

looks

at

the

patent

drawings

there

is

a

drawing

which

shows

a

product

almost

identical

to

the

one

the Defandants produced and that Judge deliberately ignored the drawing to support his fraudulent Judgement.

United Kingdom Judicial Corruption & Crime Defendant Judges Yes, you read it right - ‘Defendant Judges’. This whole affair is loathsome and sickening.
London High Court and IPEC 2013 - 2017 Click Here
London Court of Appeal, Judicial Conduct Office & Office of the Lord Chief Justice 2013 - 2017
Bristol High Court & Bath County Court 2015 - 2017 Click Here
Brief summary of the offences carried out by the judges involved: Which judge did what, in which court and when. Click the pages above for the details and evidence. Abuse of the Administration of Justice, Fraud by abuse of position and by false representation, Conspiracy to commit misconduct in Public Office, Aiding, Abetting and Subornation to Perjury, Perverting the Course of Justice, Corroboration, Dishonest Assistance, Trading in Influence, Participation in serious crime. This section of the Particulars of Claim sets out the crime and offences carried out by the Judges involved in order to aid and abet some of the other Defendants, and to follow the United Kingdom agenda of rubbishing intellectual property rights, regardless of the cost to my life and the total devastation their actions have caused. Horrifyingly, they don’t have any conscience, remorse or regret about it; they don’t give a shit what tragedy their fraudulent judgements cause as long as they prevent anyone enforcing their creative rights. For what good ???? I have pondered this many many times over the last 7 years and I cannot find a single plausible reason why the United Kingdom refuses to enforce intellectual property rights. The only reason I can think of is that because the fuddy duddy old men don’t have any IP rights and because they’ve failed in life and haven’t made it, they don’t want anyone else to be successful and the Government want to keep everyone suppressed. It is an appalling attitude towards innovation, human capital and the future of the economy of the country. What confidence does this give anyone to invest anything at all? We are now even at a stage where there are defendant judges committing crime. This Country has completely lost its way and it is the decay in the bones of Europe. These people don’t have any hesitation in sitting there making corrupt judgements and watching someone have their life torn apart whilst knowing that the law firms standing before them have submitted thousands of pages of false witness testimony to a United Kingdom Court of Law. That alone should see these Defendant firms landed with an immediate practice ban and prison sentence, but so far they’ve been allowed to get away with it and the judges involved have supported it AND written judgements on paper, in black and white, to support it. This is the ugly face of corruption and it is UGLY. It is barefaced cruelty being carried out by people who have been given positions of Authority to look after the welfare of their fellow man and uphold the rights, liberties and freedoms of others. I cannot find words to describe how sinister and sleazy the whole thing is. It makes a complete mockery of the entire justice system. I feel sorry for all of those professional people who have taken years to study to become legal practicioneers and those who have spent their lives trying to seek justice and to protect a civilized society. The entire legal profession is blackened by these dark dealings. The entire justice system is completely worthless. I feel sorry for those people and the joke is that they don’t even know it is going on. Even the barrister who represented me for one single hearing lasting only 30 minutes spoke up and told one of the judges that if what I was saying was true “then this is what the whole thing is all about” and that if there is any bar to be set for ordering evidence to be adduced then “that bar should be fairly low if there is any bar at all” (in relation to my reques to subpoena evidence). More of this in detail over the next few pages. The basic bones of the offences are: 1. Deliberately steering court cases in a direction that have no hope of achieveing justice for intellectual property related offences because the United Kingdom refuses to recognise the value of, or enforce, IP under any circumstances. 2. Denying all access to any evidence whatsoever that they know proves my allegations and in fact making up ludicrous reasons to prevent the evidence being adduced, and then making fraudulent judgements against me using the reason that in their view I didn’t have enough or any evidence because they’ve denied access to it. It is insulting and a total abuse of power. The fact is that the evidence I do have would land the ordinary person on the street with a lifetime prison sentence. 3. Corrorborating between one another to commit misconduct and abuse of the administration of justice. Trying to cover one another’s asses so that all of them have an excuse for their criminal actions. 4. Actually willfully committing fraud and authoring judgements that they know to be fraudulent and yet doing it anyway because they think they are untouchable and above the very law they are being paid to implement. I have undeniable proof that I will publish on the relevent pages. 5. Ratifying Court hearing tape transcripts to conceal their crimes by amending the wording, altering the dialogue or deliberately ommitting parts of conversations to conceal crime, support their fraudulent judgements and to make it appear to anyone reading the dialogue that there isn’t any crime. 6. Court Administration Offences such as: stealing evidence I submitted, attempting to bury claims so that they never see the light of day, or deliberately mishandling documents to throw cases off track or cause delays. Deliberately merging case files and then claiming that they’ve made mistakes so that correspondence couldn’t be found or received. Clerks conspiring with the clerks of the Defendant law firms to withold paperwork from me so that I cannot reply to it in time before the judge makes an order etc. A 21st Century United Kingdom Court of Law claiming that they don’t have the means to view video evidence on a memory stick and then stealing those memory sticks so that it doesn’t get to the Court in time. Clerks deliberately misadvising me to run me around in circles to try to make me ‘give up’ so that I can’t enforce my rights. Judges claiming that they don’t know who Action Fraud is (to the reader this is the City of London Police). Deliberately pretending that they don’t have any power to investigate or dig deeper into the situation so that I never had any chance to litigate a claim for fraud or other serious offences. It goes on…. These judges do not deserve to hold judicial office and I would like them removed from Authority.
<< Back to  Particulars Index Page << Back to  Particulars Index Page